Network Boundary Bridging

T1599

Technique with 1 sub-technique.View on attack.mitre.org

About this technique

Adversaries may bridge network boundaries by compromising perimeter network devices or internal devices responsible for network segmentation. Breaching these devices may enable an adversary to bypass restrictions on traffic routing that otherwise separate trusted and untrusted networks.

Devices such as routers and firewalls can be used to create boundaries between trusted and untrusted networks. They achieve this by restricting traffic types to enforce organizational policy in an attempt to reduce the risk inherent in such connections. Restriction of traffic can be achieved by prohibiting IP addresses, layer 4 protocol ports, or through deep packet inspection to identify applications. To participate with the rest of the network, these devices can be directly addressable or transparent, but their mode of operation has no bearing on how the adversary can bypass them when compromised.

When an adversary takes control of such a boundary device, they can bypass its policy enforcement to pass normally prohibited traffic across the trust boundary between the two separated networks without hinderance. By achieving sufficient rights on the device, an adversary can reconfigure the device to allow the traffic they want, allowing them to then further achieve goals such as command and control via Multi-hop Proxy or exfiltration of data via Traffic Duplication. Adversaries may also target internal devices responsible for network segmentation and abuse these in conjunction with Internal Proxy to achieve the same goals. In the cases where a border device separates two separate organizations, the adversary can also facilitate lateral movement into new victim environments.

Detection rules2

Rules on DetectionCode tagged with T1599 or one of its sub-techniques.

Sigma1

RuleLevelLog sourceTechnique
WinDivert Driver Loadhighwindows / driver_loadT1599.001

Splunk1

RuleTypeRiskData sourceTechnique
AWS Bedrock Claude Cross Region Possible Inference AbuseAnomalyNULLAWS Bedrock ClaudeT1599

Sub-techniques1

IDNameExamples
T1599.001Network Address Translation Traversal0

Groups1

Software0

None recorded.

Campaigns1

Procedure examples2

Groups1

Used byProcedure example
GroupAPT41

APT41 used `NATBypass` to bypass firewall restrictions and to access compromised systems via RDP.

Campaigns1

Used byProcedure example
CampaignIndian Critical Infrastructure Intrusions

Indian Critical Infrastructure Intrusions involved the use of FRP to bridge network boundaries and overcome NAT. Indian Critical Infrastructure Intrusions also involved the use of VPN tunnels with a potentially compromised MSP entity allowing for direct access to critical infrastructure entity networks.

References1

  1. Kaspersky ThreatNeedle Feb 2021 Open source
    Vyacheslav Kopeytsev and Seongsu Park. (2021, February 25). Lazarus targets defense industry with ThreatNeedle. Retrieved October 27, 2021.

Data from MITRE ATT&CK® (Enterprise). ATT&CK® is a registered trademark of The MITRE Corporation.